Private beta. Limited spots this quarter.

Your team's AI bill: 2 dashboards, 0 answers

AI Costs Dashboard joins GitHub Copilot and Claude Code on the same GitHub login, so every developer's AI spend lands in one row, checked against their budget, forecast to month end.

aicostsdashboard.app/overview
Total spend
$8,412
+12% MoM
GitHub Copilot
$3,180
+4% MoM
Anthropic
$5,232
+18% MoM
Sort any column. Demo data, real behaviour.
alice
$42$210$252112% • over
ravi
$38$96$13467% • under
priya
$31$88$11960% • under
jonas
$45$71$11658% • under
mei
$29$54$8342% • under
Projected month-end
$11,270
13% over budget
FIG 0.1 — Every developer's Copilot and Claude spend, combined and checked against budget.
  • Copilot AI credits and Claude tokens, joined on the same GitHub login
  • One row per developer: both providers, one combined cost
  • A month-end forecast that names the overspender while you can still act
  • Totals that reconcile to the GitHub and Anthropic consoles, to the cent

You rolled out AI. Now nobody can tell you what it costs, per person or in total.

AI coding tools went from a pilot budget to a real line item in one year, and finance noticed. But Copilot lives in GitHub billing, Claude Code lives in the Anthropic console, and neither one knows the other exists. So every month you hop between two dashboards, paste numbers into a spreadsheet, and still cannot answer the question finance keeps asking: what are we spending, and on whom?

Today

  • You can't even see the org's total AI spend without adding two consoles up by hand
  • The bill grows every month and you find out after it is paid, not before
  • You cannot tell a heavy user from a runaway key, so you cannot act
  • You keep paying for Copilot seats that nobody has touched in weeks

With the dashboard

One screen. Both providers. Every person, ranked by real spend, checked against their budget, with a forecast for where the month is heading.

  • Run the monthly AI review in minutes instead of an afternoon
  • Catch the overspender while there is still time to talk to them
  • Walk into the budget meeting with numbers that match the provider consoles

The vision

One place to see, understand, and control every dollar your organization spends on AI, no matter which provider or which person.

Version 1 reads GitHub Copilot and Anthropic (Claude Code). That is where your AI spend is today. The dashboard is built to grow past them. The goal is to read any provider your team adopts next, Gemini, OpenAI, Cursor, and whatever comes after, in the same single view. You add a tool, it lands here, and you never go back to hopping between dashboards to answer one question: what are we spending, and on whom?

FIG 0.2 — How it works

From two consoles to one screen in three steps

01

We set it up for you.

Tell us your team and we connect everything. You never touch a config file or an API key.

We handle it

02

See it all in one place.

Copilot and Claude costs land in one view, per person and as a running total.

Instant

03

Set budgets, watch the forecast.

Give each person a monthly budget and catch who is trending over before month end.

A couple of minutes

FIG 0.3 — What's inside

Built to answer the question finance keeps asking

Both providers, one row per person

Copilot AI-credit spend and Anthropic token spend are joined on the same GitHub login, so each developer shows up once with a single combined cost. No spreadsheet merge, no console-hopping.

aliceCopilot $42Claude $210$252 total

One person, both providers, one combined cost.

A month-end forecast, not just a receipt

Set a monthly budget per person. The dashboard tracks spend against it, counts who is over, and projects where each person lands by month end from their current run rate. You see the overspender before the invoice does.

Numbers finance can trust

The totals match what GitHub and Anthropic bill you, so you can put them straight in front of finance without second-guessing. When a figure is an estimate, the page says so plainly.

The monthly AI review done in minutes, not an afternoon of console-hopping
Overspend caught before the invoice, while you can still act
So simple anyone on the leadership team can read it, no technical skill required

FIG 0.4 — Why switch

Against what you do today

Not against a rival dashboard. Against the two consoles and the spreadsheet, which is what you are using right now.

The questionGitHub billing + Anthropic console + a spreadsheetAI Costs Dashboard
What did the org spend on AI this month?Open two consoles, add them up by handOne number, on load
What did this one developer cost?No per-person figure exists in either console — not possible todayOne row, both providers, one total
Who is over their budget?A column you maintain in a spreadsheetTracked per person, counted for you
Where does the month land?You find out when the invoice arrives — not possible todayRun-rate forecast, per person, mid-month
Which Copilot seats are dead?Not surfaced by the billing page — not possible todayRanked by last activity
How long does the monthly review take?An afternoonMinutes

Why I built this

I run an engineering team that rolled out GitHub Copilot and Claude Code in the same quarter. AI spend was suddenly real, and no single place showed me who was spending it. Every month meant opening two consoles, exporting numbers, and still not having a per-person view I could act on.

So I built the tool I wanted. One screen that combines both providers per developer, checks each person against a budget, and forecasts month-end. It started as an internal dashboard. Enough other engineering leaders had the same problem that I opened it up.

Pricing

Free while it's in private beta

Free during the private beta. No card, no commitment. After beta, Team access is $39 per seat per month. You bring your own GitHub and Anthropic access, we host and run it for you.

Private Beta

Now

Free

  • Full per-developer spend across Copilot and Claude
  • Budgets, remaining, and month-end forecast
  • Totals reconciled to the provider consoles

Team

Coming soon

$39/seat / month

  • Everything in the beta
  • Longer spend history and month-over-month comparison
  • Team-level rollups and priority support

FAQ

What engineering leaders ask first

We use Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity to see how visitors use this page. Neither loads until you say yes.